CASE STUDIES
Campaign operations outcomes with the measurement context included
ArbiNeuro case studies separate observed metrics from general promises. Results depend on traffic mix, offer economics, event quality, and rule configuration.
In short
The current published case is anonymized and compares a campaign funnel before and after configured optimization rules were used to identify and control weak traffic placements.ANONYMIZED PRODUCTION CASE
Funnel performance — before vs after rules
Each pair is scaled within its own metric. Exact values are shown.
Traffic optimization case
ROI changed from −99.24% to +7.56%; cost per registration decreased from $5.36 to $1.73; registrations per day increased from 11 to 39.7. Read the full method and evidence limits.
- Deposits per day: 0.25 → 3.65
- Profit per day: $0.44 → $5.20
- Anonymized production campaign
How we present evidence
Each metric includes the before and after value. Relative changes are not presented without the underlying numbers, and the case is not claimed as a guaranteed result.
What the case does not prove
It does not prove that every campaign will achieve the same outcome or that rules alone caused every observed change. Traffic, offer, event, and market conditions matter.
ARBINEURO
Review the case against your own baseline
Bring comparable funnel metrics and rule conditions to a live walkthrough.
Book a demo ↗